Thursday, April 27, 2006

999

YAY!

Dubya is now into triple digits for number of days left in his administration. As of today, it's 999 days.

Can't wait for double digits.

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Gay Agenda Misplaced, Feared Lost


The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the nation’s largest national gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender political organization is facing harsh criticism from other gay rights groups over the apparent loss of the 2006 Gay Agenda.

HRC spokesperson, Steven Fisher, broke the news yesterday at a press conference in New York. “We had this year’s final gay agenda drafted. We sent one of our interns to make copies, and he inadvertently left it on a crosstown bus on his way to Kinkos.”

The highly sensitive document, a political playbook of sorts for homosexual activists, was to be distributed to a select group of high-ranking gay rights leaders next month at the annual Lavender Law conference and Tea Dance.

When asked why HRC kept no backup copies, Fisher went on the defensive. “You can’t have multiple copies of the Agenda just floating around. As in prior years, we maintained only one copy of the 2006 Agenda to make certain it didn’t fall into the wrong hands. Obviously, conservative Christian groups would love to get an advance peek of what we’re up to. Secrecy is vital! Our continued, successful assault on traditional family values depends on the element of surprise.”

Fisher closed yesterday’s press conference with assurances that steps were being taken to rectify the situation. “HRC takes full responsibility for the Agenda’s loss. The intern has, of course, been shot. Also, we’ve made repeated calls to New York Transit Authority’s Lost and Found department.”

But Fisher added that since the binder containing the Agenda has not been turned in as yet, “we are appealing to the homosexual bus-riding community to be on the lookout for it. It’s in a vinyl Hello Kitty Trapper Keeper. If anyone sees it, please contact HRC immediately.”



Thursday, March 30, 2006

Scalia = Asshole

How can someone with obvious prejudices be allowed to continue to sit on the highest court in the land, and still be considered "unbiased" and intrepreting the constitution?

(Washington) A tape of a speech given earlier this month by Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has drawn the ire of LGBT civil rights activists who worry the landmark high court ruling on sodomy could be revisited.

Scalia rarely speaks to the media and seldom allows the press into speeches he gives but a recording of a March 8 address at the University of Freiberg in Switzerland was obtained by CNN.

In one portion of the speech to law students at the university Scalia brings up the issue of homosexuality.

"Question comes up: is there a constitutional right to homosexual conduct? Not a hard question for me. It's absolutely clear that nobody ever thought when the Bill of Rights was adopted that it gave a right to homosexual conduct. Homosexual conduct was criminal for 200 years in every state. Easy question."

He also told the students that foreigners waging war against the United States have no rights under the Constitution.

Earlier this month, the governor of South Dakota signed a law that makes it illegal for a woman to have an abortion. It is widely expected that the will be appealed, opening the way for the Supreme Court to revisit Roe v Wade.

A similar scenario could also send sodomy back to the high court.

In 2003, in a 6 - 3 decision, the Supreme Court overturned laws against sodomy, saying that states cannot make laws regarding the private sexual conduct of Americans.

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.

"The court has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda," Scalia wrote for the three. He took the unusual step of reading his dissent from the bench.

"The court has taken sides in the culture war," Scalia said, adding that he has "nothing against homosexuals."

With the high court more conservative than it was three years ago, LGBT leaders are worried the court may reverse itself.

"Justice Scalia stubbornly refuses to see that all Americans have a right to liberty and privacy under the law," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.

"Justice Scalia was dangerously out of step with Americans in 2003 when the Supreme Court decided this question and he remains so today.

"This is just the latest example of why it's so critical that fair-minded Americans think of the Court when they head to the ballot box. With the Supreme Court tipping further to the right, these sentiments could one day become reality," said Solmonese.



Wednesday, March 29, 2006

NY Marriage Law Gets Another Step Closer to Ruling


(New York City) A third case by same-sex couples seeking the right to marry is a step closer to New York's highest court. An appeal was filed in a midlevel court on Tuesday on behalf of the so-called Nyack 10.

Among the 10 couples is Nyack Mayor John Shields and his partner.

In 2004 the couples sought marriage licenses at the Orangetown Town Hall. When they were turned down they sued. A lower court judge dismissed the case saying marriage should be decided by the legislature.

The lawyer for the couples, Norman Siegel, filed papers Tuesday in the Second Appellate Division in Brooklyn. The appeal says that denying same-sex couples the right to marry is violates the state constitution.

Whatever the outcome in the case it is likely to be appealed by one side or the other to the high court - the Court of Appeal - where two other cases involving same-sex couples are already waiting.

The first case will be argued on May 31. That one involves five gay and lesbian couples from Manhattan who were denied marriage licenses in New York City. The couples are represented by Lambda Legal.

Last December an appeals court overturned a lower court ruling that found the ban on gay marriage was illegal. (story)

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg appealed Ling-Cohan's decision and Lambda in turn appealed the appellate decision.

In Lambda's written brief to the high court it states, in part, that, "This appeal is about far more than abstract legal principles. At heart, it concerns real New York families who share the same love and day-to-day journey together through life that binds married couples."

In the second case, the ACLU is representing 12 same-sex couples, among them New York State Assemblyman Danny O'Donnell and his partner John Banta. (story) O'Donnell is the brother of Rosie O'Donnell.

Written arguments were submitted earlier this month and the high court has not yet set a date to hear arguments.

The Court of Appeals could render a decision in the Lambda case first, making moot the other two, or it could wait until it has heard arguments in all three.


Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Tidbits

-

PRE-ORDER BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN NOW -- RELEASE DATE 4/4/06

List Price:
$29.98
B&N Price:
$20.98(Save 30%)
item will be available on April 4.


WHAT POWER WE HAVE!

First, we brought on 9/11, then we brought on Katrina, now:

(Jerusalem) A prominent Kabbalah leader says that gays have brought a plague of bird flu on Israel.

With all this power, why are we letting legislators ask for rights for us? Why don't we just TAKE 'em?

CONNECTICUT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LAWSUIT BEGINS

(New Haven, Connecticut) Eight same-sex couples suing the state of Connecticut for the right to marry said Tuesday as the case opened they are "cautiously optimistic".

NEW HAMPSHIRE LAWMAKERS STOP ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE AMENDMENT DEAD IN ITS TRACKS

(Concord, New Hampshire) The New Hampshire House delivered a crushing blow on Tuesday to supporters of an amendment to the state constitution that would ban same-sex marriage.

LEFT COAST OCCUPANTS MORE INCLINED TO SUPPORT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE THESE DAYS

(San Francisco, California) The gap between those in Californian who oppose same-sex marriage and those who are accepting is narrowing a new poll shows.